Une session en présentiel de l'« examen de control » de l'UNAM sera‑t‑elle annulée, reportée ou suspendue par une injonction fédérale ?

Pourquoi : The supplied evidence shows that aspirants filed federal amparos but federal judges did not issue injunctions halting the scheduled in-person Examen de Control, and the university proceeded with the sessions. Latinus (reports dated Aug 10) states the Juzgado Tercero de Distrito in Guanajuato admitted amparos but "se negó la suspensión provisional solicitada" (the requested provisional suspension was denied) and set hearings for September. El Ceo likewise reports that the district judges handling initial amparos did not grant suspensions and requested more information from petitioners. UNAM’s own Gaceta (Aug 10) published the schedule (León 12–13, Oaxaca 13, Tijuana 15–16, CDMX 17–19) and the appointment system, and Eje Central (Aug 17) reports the Examen de Control began in CDMX (with sessions continuing on the 18th and 19th) and that only individual tests were cancelled by UNAM for misconduct (not due to a court order). None of the supplied sources reports any Mexican federal court (juzgado de distrito or tribunal colegiado) having issued an order that explicitly suspended, cancelled, or ordered UNAM to refrain from conducting one or more scheduled in-person sessions between 2026-08-12 and 2026-08-19; on the contrary, some reports explicitly record denials of provisional suspensions. Therefore, based on the provided evidence, the correct resolution is NO.