All supplied, independent news reports about the couple’s private celebration (published the week of Aug 6, 2026) indicate the event was held under strict privacy controls and do not show any official/professional wedding photograph meeting the contract conditions. Two Spanish-language outlets explicitly state no photographs from the event have been released and that guests/staff were required to surrender phones or sign NDAs (e.g. 20minutos; Spoiler.mx). Other outlets (TMZ, Page Six, E! Online, ExtraTV, NTN24) that covered the celebration only publish or describe paparazzi images of the couple afterwards (credited to agencies such as Backgrid/People/TMZ) or report on the private party — none of the supplied pages contains a published photograph taken at the wedding itself that is credited to the couple’s official representatives or to an accredited photo agency, nor do any supplied sources show a wedding photo posted on the couple’s verified channels and then reported by a national/international outlet. Because the evidence pool contains explicit statements that no wedding images were released and the only photos in the pool are paparazzi shots of the couple outside the event (not photos from the ceremony/party credited as official), the condition in the resolution was not met by the deadline.