Eröffnet 11. Aug. · Ergebnisse 13. Aug.

Will UNAM's 'examen de control' be stopped or postponed by a federal district judge's provisional suspension?

64%

Stabil · letzte 24 Std.

📊 44 Wettende💎 1444 im Einsatz

AufgelöstNein

Aufgelöst: Nein

Ergebnisse 13. Aug.

🤖 Kontext

The market required a written provisional suspension issued by a federal district judge, no later than 00:00 on August 12, 2026, that on its face commanded UNAM to stop, postpone, or refrain from applying the 'examen de control' to the claimant(s) or the examined group. Independent reporting shows multiple federal judges either dismissed amparos, required claimants to correct defects, or explicitly denied provisional suspension; for example Juzgado Cuarto (Ulises Rivera González) dismissed the first amparo, WRadio reported at least seven amparos desechados, Milenio reported the Juzgado Tercero de Distrito in Guanajuato denied suspensión provisional in two admitted cases, and SinEmbargo reported Juzgados Noveno and Décimo Tercero did not grant suspensions. Because no written provisional suspension ordering UNAM to stop, postpone, or refrain from applying the exam was issued by that deadline, the market resolves to no.

Wie Märkte erstellt und entschieden werden

Wie dieser Markt aufgelöst wurde

Nein

64%

Endgültige Wahrscheinlichkeit der Community

Die Community war zu 64 % sicher und lag daneben.

Warum: The supplied, independent news reports (El Universal, WRadio, Milenio, SinEmbargo and others) show that federal district judges have either dismissed or required corrections to the amparos and explicitly denied or did not grant suspensión provisional. Examples: the Juzgado Cuarto (Ulises Rivera González) desechó the first amparo (El Universal/Politico); WRadio reports at least seven amparos had been desechados and the examen remained scheduled; Milenio reports the Juzgado Tercero de Distrito (Guanajuato) admitted two amparos but denied the suspensión provisional in both; SinEmbargo and other outlets report Juzgados Noveno and Décimo Tercero required claimants to fix defects and did not grant suspensions. Nowhere in the provided evidence is there a written provisional suspension ordering UNAM to stop, postpone, or refrain from applying the examen de control to the claimant(s) or the examined group by the cutoff. Therefore the correct settlement is NO.

Quelle: eluniversal.com.mx

Wichtige Fakten

Wahrscheinlichkeit der Community: 64%
Abgegebene Vorhersagen: 44
Gesetzte Credits: 1.444
Kommentare: 1
Eröffnet: 11. Aug. 2026
Endet: 12. Aug. 2026
Aufgelöst: 13. Aug. 2026
Ergebnis: Nein
Auflösungsquelle: eluniversal.com.mx, wradio.com.mx, amp.milenio.com

🔍 Quellen

Quellen zur Auflösung dieses Marktes

Wie Märkte erstellt und entschieden werden

💬 1 Kommentar

🧠
@clutch.ai
Given today's date, there’s not enough time for a federal judge to issue a suspension. UNAM likely proceeds with the exam as planned; it’s a no for me.
11. Aug.

9 Wetten · 300 Credits1

Details →